Tuesday, June 26, 2012

The Curious Case of the Dog in the Night-time

By Mark Haddon. Short and exceptionally quick read. The narrator is a 15 year old boy with severe social problems and they don't exactly say in the book what it is but I think he has a serious degree of autism or aspergers, but it helps him focus on things so he has incredible mathematical skills. Anyway, it was a little strange letting myself be the persona of the story, like I normally do. The narration reminded me of perks of being a wallflower or cather in the rye but it was more socially awkward. I got mad at him a bunch too and it was kind of a tragic story because he is such a hassle to live with and he really doesnt feel love so he cannot appreciate his fathers efforts. And so no one really wins in the end because its kind of a story of unrequitted love. Yes, the story is hopeful in the end because they are probably going to live with eachother and Christorpher will stop being so afraid of his father, but the reader knows their lives will still be rough. His dad will feel guilty when he feels burdened by his son but he will also never be able to have a relationship with a woman because of his son.
Sometimes I connected with the kid because I'm socially awkward I guess and I feel like him sometimes in social situations being so overwhelmed and stuff. The difference though is that I don't start rolling around on the ground screaming. But then again I'm not as academically gifted as him and I would definitely like to be.
The book was okay and I'm glad I read it, maybe just because it was so short.
Makes you think!

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Reading still

I just read a political book. I don't wanna say who by because I don't wanna start a mob, but it was good. Real good. Peace.

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Perks of Being a Wallflower


I just finished Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky. I know I'm terribly late on this one but I have been wanting to read it for a while- I just never had the chance. It was really good and it was a whole lot like Catcher in the Rye, which i loved also. Maybe, though, it was too much like Catcher in the Rye- maybe the author pretty much copied Catcher. Both books, and I'm not sure how it's done, have a very likeable tone, a real voice that is almost childlike and innocent. The tone of catcher and perks is like the familiar, cozy tone of Junie B Jones, and I absolutely love that. Holden Caulfield was a little more funny and Perks was a little more sad. But they both battled with depression and had strange encounters with people because they both looking for more substance in the world and they both ended up in mental hospitals. I read Perks because even though I'm not a liberal, i know it is pretty much the hipster's Bible so I wanted to be culturally literate and that's why I read it. Sometimes I'm a wallflower because the quote really got to me that "people use thought to not participate in life" and that's what I do. My family calls me a hermit crab and I've been okay with that because I've always said to myself "im busy doing other, more important things; I'm busy thinking." But is it worth it? To be proud and let life go by? I think that's what this book is saying.

I think the movie for Perks is gonna suck an awful lot. I probably won't see it.

Love always,
Mallory

Monday, June 4, 2012

This is to remind me to read it

^George Orwell essay

Triangles



Just finished Triangles. With Ellen Hopkins, you can read a 600 page book in one day, easily. It's so refreshing. The teen fiction novel is a bungle of adjectives: entertaining, poetic, innapropriate, depressing and anticlimactic. She usually tells the stories of some pretty flawed characters, and you know you would just absolutely hate the person, if you did not hear the story told in first person. It helps you understand people and why sometimes they do the terrible things they do. She is a good writer, too, because every page is a a really unique poem, kind of. And for me, it would take a long time to create 600 pages of poems that create a story. but she does it, everytime and I enjoy it everytime because I have read every single one of her books. Even the ones about middle aged women (this one) that no one reads. Hopkins probably should have stuck with teen personas though, because the women basically sound and act like teenagers and the whole thing seems so silly because these 40 year old women are engaging in completely wreckless and immature activities.
Oh, well, though. She took a chance, and ultimately it was entertaining.
P.S. I hate the cover art.

June 4th 2012

Pinned Image